Tokai Park information:
An interim interdict has been issued staying the felling of the pines
See below for the court order (a rule nisi). This also affords interested parties the opportunity to make submissions.
The authorities, organisations, institutes and individuals who are in favour of removing the remaining Monterey Pine plantations at Tokai Plantation are simply trying to:
1) conserve and restore a vegetation type (Cape Flats Sand Fynbos) that is considered to be Critically Endangered at local, national and international levels;
2) inform those of the Tokai community that might not understand the importance/significance/value of the conservation of this habitat (vegetation type); and,
3) support SANParks and SANBI in their mandated responsibility to conserve nature and natural systems.
Here is a link to an excellent summary of information about this vegetation type:
Bothasig community protecting a Cape Flats Sand Fynbos remnant;
Meadowridge common – celebrating Cape Flats Sand Fynbos;
Friends.of.Rondebosch.Common – another Cape Flats Sand Fynbos remnant;
Kenilworth Racecourse Conservation Area.
If you choose to write this information off as nay saying – that is your choice and your right to an opinion. I do not see it as nay saying – I see it as giving information that is critically important to making present day choices for long term conservation gain.
Here is the court order – click on each image to read the text.
(Note – the court orders have now been upsized to a reasonable size)
https://www.ensafrica.com/news/a-brief-discussion-on-interdicts?Id=209
Hoping that SANParks will get more support than it already has – calling all big guns to the matter.
An excerpt:
“4 Urgent relief
It is often necessary to apply for an interim interdict on an urgent basis; and in certain circumstances by way of an ex parte application (that is without notice to the respondent). In these cases the court (if it grants the interim interdict) will issue a rule nisi, which will order the respondent to come before the court on a particular date, to show cause as to why the interim interdict should not be made a final interdict.
5. Summary of the steps taken to obtain an interdict:
5.1 An application for an interim interdict is brought on notice of motion with a founding affidavit.
5.2 If the matter is urgent, the application may be brought ex parte, with a rule nisi granted with a return date.
5.3 The rule nisi is thereafter served on the other side and the respondent must show cause on the return day why the rule should not be confirmed and a final interdict granted.
5.4 When requesting an interim interdict, the applicant will ask for temporary relief, which will operate until the return day.
5.5 The interdict sought on the return day is usually final, but may again be interim. “